Lifeclinic: Blood Pressure Monitors & Health Stations
HomeBlood PressureCholesterolDiabetesNutritionSenior Care
Key Word Search
 
My Health Record
FREE
Blood Pressure Health Station Locator
Locate a Dealer
Patient Pamphlets
Free Publications
Book Reviews
Topics In Hypertension
News
Resources
Cookbook
Health News
Reminders
My Saved Articles
Links
About Us
Contact Us
Press Releases
Advertising
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
 

Implications from the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study

Tedine Ranich,MD
Medical School, George Washington University

Highlights:

  • Previous studies have shown that ACE inhibitors improve survival in post-MI patients and heart failure.
  • HOPE was designed to test the effects of ACE inihibition in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events
  • HOPE showed that ramipril reduced the rate of MIs by 20%, strokes by 32%, and cardiovascular mortality by 26%.
  • ACE inhibitors should be incorporated into the treatment of high-risk patients.

I. Rationale and Design of the Hope Study

Many studies showing a benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) in patients with cardiovascular disease preceded The HOPE Trial. The first of these described the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors inpatients with heart failure rather than hypertension. The Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study showed a significant mortality benefit in severely ill heart failure patients with the addition of an ACE inhibitor to standard therapy of diuretics and vasodilators. This small study was followed by more comprehensive and definitive studies designed to assess the benefit of ACE inhibitors in left ventricular dysfunction and in post-myocardial infarction patients.

The Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) included both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with ejection fractions less than 35% and randomized both groups to either enalapril or placebo in addition to standard therapy. Symptomatic patients enjoyed a 20% survival benefit with ACE inhibitors; however, the survival benefit for asymptomatic patients was not statistically significant. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients required fewer hospitalizations for the management of heart failure after being put on ACE inhibitor therapy. The first major clinical trial to show a benefit of ACE inhibitors in post-myocardial infarction patients was the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Study (SAVE). SAVE showed that patients with an ejection fraction of less than 40% following an acute myocardial infarction achieved a significant survival benefit with the addition of an ACE inhibitor to standard therapy.

In addition to the dramatic survival benefits documented in heart failure patients in the SOLVD and SAVE trials, patients treated with ACE inhibitors in these trials also experienced a reduction in coronary events, specifically myocardial infarction. This decreased coronary event rate led investigators to question whether ACE inhibitors could somehow interrupt or attenuate the atherosclerotic process, providing the foundation for the HOPE study. HOPE was thus designed to determine whether ACE inhibitors could prevent cardiovascular events in patients at high-risk for coronary events, but who had not necessarily already experienced one.

II. The HOPE Trial

The specific hypothesis tested in the HOPE study was the following: Would the addition of the ACE inhibitor ramipril to current medical therapy reduce cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke in patients who are high-risk or have established vascular disease? This prospective, multicenter study randomized participants to 10 mg ramipril or placebo daily and to 400 IU vitamin E or placebo daily in a 2x2 factorial study design. To be included in the study, patients had to have a history of myocardial infarction, stroke, established peripheral vascular disease, or diabetes mellitus plus at least one other established cardiovascular risk factor. Patients were excluded if they had heart failure, a known ejection fraction of less than 40%, or a myocardial infarction or stroke within four weeks before the start of the study.

The investigators recruited and randomized 9297 participants, of whom 8162 had established cardiovascular disease, 5128 were at least 65 years old, 4355 had hypertension, and 3577 had diabetes. The average baseline blood pressure was 139/79 mmHg in both the ramipril and placebo treated groups. At baseline, microalbuminuria was detected in 20% of ramipril-treated subjects and 22% of controls. More than 75% of all patients were treated with aspirin at the time of entry into the study. [Table I] The patients were followed for a median time of 4.5 years as the study was prematurely terminated due to significantly better survival in the ramipril treated group.

Table I. Selected Baseline Characteristics of HOPE Study Participants

CharacteristicRamipril Group Placebo Group
(N=4645)(N=4652)

Age (years) 66+766+7
Blood Pressure (mmHg) 139+20/79+11139+20/79+11
Body Mass Index 28+428+4
Female Sex (%) 27.525.8
History of CAD (%) 79.581.4
Stroke or TIA (%) 10.811.0
PVD (%) 42.344.8
Hypertension (%) 47.646.1
Diabetes (%) 38.938.0
Hypercholesterolemia (%) 65.466.4
Low HDL cholesterol (%) 18.118.9
Current cigarette smoker (%) 13.914.5
LVH on EKG (%) 8.28.7
Microalbuminuria (%)20.521.6
Medications (%)
   Beta-blockers39.239.8
   Aspirin/other antiplatelet 75.376.9
   Lipid-lowering agent 28.428.8
   Diuretics15.315.2
   Calcium-channel blockers 46.347.9

CAD-coronary artery disease, TIA-transient ischemic attacks, PVD-peripheral vascular disease.

NEJM 2000 Jan 20;342(3):145-53

The results of the HOPE Study were impressive in the magnitude of benefit attained by treatment with ramipril. Participants treated with ramipril achieved a 22% risk reduction in the combined primary outcomes of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death. When the primary outcome components were analyzed separately, the ramipril-treated subjects experienced significant risk reductions of 20% for myocardial infarction, 32% for stroke, and 26% for cardiovascular death. These data are quite convincing considering that over 9000 participants were followed for almost five years, and the fact that 17.5% of the placebo treated group had a primary cardiovascular outcome. [Table II] The most definitive outcome of this trial was a significant decrease of 16% for all-cause mortality in the ramipril treated group. The consistency and magnitude of risk reduction for cardiovascular events in ramipril treated subjects resulted in this substantial decrease in total mortality that epitomizes the significance of this important study.


Table II. HOPE Study Results: Primary Outcomes and Deaths from Any Cause

OUTCOMEINCIDENCE (%) RELATIVE RISK
Ramipril Group Placebo Group Ramipril vs Placebo

Myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular cause 1417.80.78*
Death from cardiovascular cause6.18.10.74*
Myocardial infarction9.912.30.80*
Stroke3.44.90.68*
Death from any cause10.412.20.84**

NEJM 2000 Jan 20;342(3):145-53 *P<0.001,**P<0.005

The reduction in primary cardiovascular outcomes was well supported by substantial reductions in secondary outcome measures, such as revascularization procedures and hospitalizations for unstable angina or heart failure; each of these secondary endpoints were reduced with ramipril. In addition to the reductions of secondary cardiovascular outcomes, a risk reduction of 16% for ramipril treated subjects was reported for complications related to diabetes such as diabetic nephropathy, initiation of dialysis, or laser therapy for diabetic retinopathy. One of the most fascinating outcomes of this study was the reduction in newly diagnosed cases of diabetes mellitus. In the ramipril group there were 3.6% of participants versus 5.4% of placebo controls who developed diabetes mellitus for an impressive 34% relative risk reduction.

Table III.HOPE Study Results: Selected Secondary and Other Outcomes


OUTCOMEINCIDENCE (%) RELATIVE RISK P VALUE
Ramipril Group Placebo Group Ramipril vs Placebo

Secondary outcomes
Revascularization 16.0 18.3 0.85 0.002
Complications related to diabetes*# 6.4 7.6 0.84 0.002
Other outcomes
Heart failure# 9.0 11.5 0.77 0.001
Worsening angina# 23.8 26.2 0.89 0.004
New diagnosis of diabetes 3.6 5.4 0.66 0.001

Complications related to diabetes include diabetic nephropathy, dialysis, and diabetic retinopathy requiring laser therapy.
NEJM 2000 Jan 20;342(3):145-53

The HOPE Trial included over 3500 participants with diabetes mellitus accounting for almost 40% of the total study population. This study has thus become one of the largest diabetes trials to date and allows for meaningful subgroup analysis. The HOPE diabetic patients had significant comorbidities with approximately 55-60% having been previously diagnosed with coronary artery disease and about 55% with hypertension. These diabetic participants experienced a significant risk reduction of 25% in the combined primary outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death as well as individual risk reductions of 22% for myocardial infarction, 33% for stroke and 37% for cardiovascular death. A risk reduction of 16% for overt nephropathy, laser retinal therapy or initiation of dialysis was likewise attained by the ramipril treated diabetic participants. These results were again dramatic and consistent, and they were comparable to those established in the main analysis.

Additional subgroup analysis revealed a higher absolute incidence of endpoints in hypertensive patients when compared to those without hypertension. Subjects with microalbuminuria also had a higher absolute event rate compared with nonalbuminuric participants. The relative risk reduction for the primary composite outcome persisted despite these differences.

IV. Clinical Implications of the HOPE Trial

The HOPE study showed that ramipril therapy produced dramatic survival benefits and improved clinical outcomes in high risk patients with and without established cardiovascular disease. The authors of this study have attributed the improved clinical outcomes and decreased mortality specifically to ACE inhibitors and blockade of the renin-angiotensin system rather than blood pressure reduction. The magnitude of blood pressure reduction in this trial (3/2 mmHg) was modest. According to the HOPE investigators, this degree of blood pressure reduction appeared to have played only a minor role and likely accounted for less than half of the risk reduction reported. Like others, they have postulated that the ACE inhibitor, ramipril, may have a direct protective effect on the endothelium, vasculature and myocardium. However, this trial was not designed to answer this mechanistic question.

These results clearly support the use of an ACE inhibitor as essential therapy for high risk patients with cardiovascular disease. Using strict evidence-based medicine, JNC VI currently recommends the use of ACE inhibitors as initial drug therapy only for hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus and proteinuria, heart failure, or myocardial infarction with systolic dysfunction. The striking results of the HOPE trial should compel physicians to include high cardiovascular risk (defined as a history of stroke, myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, or diabetes plus an additional independent risk factor) as a compelling indication for ACE inhibitors as initial therapy.

TABLE IV: Indications for ACE Inhibitors as First-Line Antihypertensive Therapy

INDICATIONJNC-VI HOPE

Post-MI with LV dysfunction X
Congestive Heart Failure X
Diabetes mellitus with albuminuria X
High-risk for cardiovascular event* X

*history of stroke, MI, peripheral arterial disease or diabetes plus at least one other CV Risk Factor

The dramatic results of this trial also support the contention of the JNC that there is no absolute blood pressure cut-off point above which treatment is essential and below which treatment has no benefit. Relative risk reductions in HOPE were independent of baseline blood pressure, and the majority of patients had blood pressure <140/90 mmHg at study entry. JNC-VI recommends a risk-stratification approach whereby level of blood pressure as well as the presence or absence of other cardiovascular risk factors, established cardiovascular disease, or end-organ damage stratifies individual patients. Pharmacological therapy is recommended for high-risk patients (risk group C according to JNC-VI nomenclature) even if the blood pressure is significantly below the traditional cut-off of 140/90 mmHg. This discussion is particularly relevant given recent analysis of Framingham Data that illustrates that 33% of patients with 'high normal' blood pressure (130-140/85-90 mmHg) fall into JNC-VI risk group C (highest risk group).

Concern remains about the possible adverse effects of ACE inhibitor therapy. In the HOPE trial, the most commonly encountered adverse effect was cough, which occurred in about 7% of ramipril treated participants. More serious adverse reactions such as angioedema were quite rare and occurred in only 0.4% of ramipril treated subjects. Adverse reactions do occur but in a small minority of patients and should not dissuade the clinician from using ACE inhibitors in these high-risk vascular disease patients who stand to gain a substantial benefit.

There may also be additional benefits from ACE inhibitor therapy as compared to other agents. Patients treated with ramipril in the HOPE Trial had a significantly lower incidence of new diagnosis of diabetes when compared to those who received placebo. This stands in sharp contrast to data with other anti-hypertensive agents, especially diuretics and beta-blockers. For example, a recent retrospective analysis of beta-blocker therapy (ARIC) revealed a 28% increase in the incidence of new diabetes as compared to other agents.

In the past, questions have been raised about a possible negative interaction between aspirin and ACE inhibitors. This concern likely stemmed from some observations from the SOLVD study where there was a trend for less benefit of the ACE inhibitor in a subgroup of patients on aspirin. In the HOPE study more than 70% of patients were on aspirin and no negative interaction between the two drugs was perceived. The addition of ACE inhibitors to aspirin therapy in this patient population may actually produce an additive beneficial effect as has been observed in the post-myocardial infarction studies.

The HOPE study has convincingly demonstrated that ACE inhibitor therapy can be used safely in combination with standard medical therapy for high risk cardiovascular disease patients with or without coexistent hypertension. ACE inhibitors should not replace other therapies, but should be used in combination with them in order to achieve the highest possible survival benefit for patients at risk. High-risk vascular disease patients stand to benefit considerably from the concerted efforts of physicians to employ the knowledge gained from the HOPE trial.

Selected References:

1. Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 20;342(3):145-53.

2. The HOPE Study Investigators. Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE substudy. Lancet. 2000 Jan 22;355(9200):253-9.

3. National Institutes of Health. The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute;November 1997. NIH Publication No. 98-4080.



 
PAGE OPTIONS
Bookmark Printer Friendly Format Email This Page
CONTACT
Technical Help

 
 

As the world’s top supplier of commercial blood pressure monitors and health management systems, Lifeclinic is committed to helping to improve the health and wellbeing of individuals across the globe. Active monitoring of blood pressure, heart rate, weight, body fat, body mass index (BMI) and blood oxygen levels when combined with proper diet, nutrition and physical fitness can help ensure a longer, more healthy lifestyle.

© 2009 Lifeclinic International, Inc.