|
Tedine Ranich,MD Medical School, George Washington University
|
Highlights:
- Previous
studies have shown that ACE inhibitors improve survival in post-MI
patients and heart failure.
- HOPE
was designed to test the effects of ACE inihibition in patients at high
risk for cardiovascular events
- HOPE
showed that ramipril reduced the rate of MIs by 20%, strokes by 32%, and
cardiovascular mortality by 26%.
- ACE
inhibitors should be incorporated into the treatment of high-risk
patients.
|
I. Rationale and Design of the Hope
Study
Many studies
showing a benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors)
in patients with cardiovascular disease preceded The HOPE Trial. The first of these described the beneficial
effects of ACE inhibitors inpatients with heart failure rather than hypertension. The Cooperative North Scandinavian
Enalapril Survival Study showed a significant mortality benefit in severely ill
heart failure patients with the addition of an ACE inhibitor to standard therapy
of diuretics and vasodilators. This
small study was followed by more comprehensive and definitive studies designed
to assess the benefit of ACE inhibitors in left ventricular dysfunction and in
post-myocardial infarction patients.
The Studies of
Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) included both symptomatic and asymptomatic
patients with ejection fractions less than 35% and randomized both groups to
either enalapril or placebo in addition to standard therapy. Symptomatic patients enjoyed a 20%
survival benefit with ACE inhibitors; however, the survival benefit for
asymptomatic patients was not statistically significant. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic
patients required fewer hospitalizations for the management of heart failure
after being put on ACE inhibitor therapy.
The first major clinical trial to show a benefit of ACE inhibitors in
post-myocardial infarction patients was the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement
Study (SAVE). SAVE showed that
patients with an ejection fraction of less than 40% following an acute
myocardial infarction achieved a significant survival benefit with the addition
of an ACE inhibitor to standard therapy.
In addition to
the dramatic survival benefits documented in heart failure patients in the SOLVD
and SAVE trials, patients treated with ACE inhibitors in these trials also
experienced a reduction in coronary events, specifically myocardial
infarction. This decreased coronary
event rate led investigators to question whether ACE inhibitors could somehow
interrupt or attenuate the atherosclerotic process, providing the foundation for
the HOPE study. HOPE was thus
designed to determine whether ACE inhibitors could prevent cardiovascular events
in patients at high-risk for coronary events, but who had not necessarily
already experienced one.
II. The HOPE Trial
The specific hypothesis
tested in the HOPE study was the following: Would the addition of the ACE
inhibitor ramipril to current medical therapy reduce cardiovascular death,
myocardial infarction and stroke in patients who are high-risk or have
established vascular disease? This
prospective, multicenter study randomized participants to 10 mg ramipril or
placebo daily and to 400 IU vitamin E or placebo daily in a 2x2 factorial study
design. To be included in the
study, patients had to have a history of myocardial infarction, stroke,
established peripheral vascular disease, or diabetes mellitus plus at least one
other established cardiovascular risk factor. Patients were excluded if they had heart
failure, a known ejection fraction of less than 40%, or a myocardial infarction
or stroke within four weeks before the start of the study.
The
investigators recruited and randomized 9297 participants, of whom 8162 had
established cardiovascular disease, 5128 were at least 65 years old, 4355 had
hypertension, and 3577 had diabetes. The average baseline blood
pressure was 139/79 mmHg in both the ramipril and placebo treated groups. At baseline, microalbuminuria was
detected in 20% of ramipril-treated subjects and 22% of controls. More than 75% of all patients were
treated with aspirin at the time of entry into the study. [Table I] The patients were followed for a median
time of 4.5 years as the study was prematurely terminated due to significantly
better survival in the ramipril treated group.
Table I. Selected Baseline
Characteristics of HOPE Study Participants
|
| Characteristic | Ramipril Group | Placebo Group |
| | (N=4645) | (N=4652) |
|
| Age (years) | 66+7 | 66+7 |
| Blood Pressure (mmHg) | 139+20/79+11 | 139+20/79+11 |
| Body Mass Index | 28+4 | 28+4 |
| Female Sex (%) | 27.5 | 25.8 |
| History of CAD (%) | 79.5 | 81.4 |
| Stroke or TIA (%) | 10.8 | 11.0 |
| PVD (%) | 42.3 | 44.8 |
| Hypertension (%) | 47.6 | 46.1 |
| Diabetes (%) | 38.9 | 38.0 |
| Hypercholesterolemia (%) | 65.4 | 66.4 |
| Low HDL cholesterol (%) | 18.1 | 18.9 |
| Current cigarette smoker
(%) | 13.9 | 14.5 |
| LVH
on EKG (%) | 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Microalbuminuria
(%) | 20.5 | 21.6 |
| Medications
(%) | | |
|
Beta-blockers | 39.2 | 39.8 |
|
Aspirin/other
antiplatelet | 75.3 | 76.9 |
|
Lipid-lowering
agent | 28.4 | 28.8 |
|
Diuretics | 15.3 | 15.2 |
|
Calcium-channel
blockers
| 46.3 | 47.9 |
|
|
CAD-coronary artery disease, TIA-transient ischemic
attacks, PVD-peripheral vascular disease.
NEJM
2000 Jan 20;342(3):145-53
The
results of the HOPE Study were impressive in the magnitude of benefit
attained by treatment with ramipril. Participants treated with ramipril
achieved a 22% risk reduction in the combined primary outcomes of
myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death. When the primary outcome
components were analyzed separately, the ramipril-treated subjects
experienced significant risk reductions of 20% for myocardial infarction,
32% for stroke, and 26% for cardiovascular death. These data are quite convincing
considering that over 9000 participants were followed for almost five
years, and the fact that 17.5% of the placebo treated group had a primary
cardiovascular outcome. [Table II]
The most definitive outcome of this trial was a significant
decrease of 16% for all-cause mortality in the ramipril treated
group. The consistency and
magnitude of risk reduction for cardiovascular events in ramipril treated
subjects resulted in this substantial decrease in total mortality that
epitomizes the significance of this important
study. |
Table II. HOPE Study
Results: Primary Outcomes and Deaths from Any Cause
|
| OUTCOME | INCIDENCE (%) | RELATIVE
RISK |
| | Ramipril
Group | Placebo Group | Ramipril vs
Placebo |
|
| Myocardial
infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular cause | 14 | 17.8 | 0.78* |
| Death
from cardiovascular cause | 6.1 | 8.1 | 0.74* |
| Myocardial
infarction | 9.9 | 12.3 | 0.80* |
| Stroke | 3.4 | 4.9 | 0.68* |
| Death
from any cause | 10.4 | 12.2 | 0.84** |
|
| NEJM
2000 Jan 20;342(3):145-53 | | |
*P<0.001,**P<0.005 |
The
reduction in primary cardiovascular outcomes was well supported by substantial
reductions in secondary outcome measures, such as revascularization procedures
and hospitalizations for unstable angina or heart failure; each of these
secondary endpoints were reduced with ramipril. In addition to the reductions of
secondary cardiovascular outcomes, a risk reduction of 16% for ramipril treated
subjects was reported for complications related to diabetes such as diabetic
nephropathy, initiation of dialysis, or laser therapy for diabetic
retinopathy. One of the most
fascinating outcomes of this study was the reduction in newly diagnosed cases of
diabetes mellitus. In
the ramipril group there were 3.6% of participants versus 5.4% of placebo
controls who developed diabetes mellitus for an impressive 34% relative
risk reduction.
Table III.HOPE Study Results: Selected
Secondary and Other Outcomes
|
| OUTCOME | INCIDENCE (%) | RELATIVE
RISK | P VALUE
|
| | Ramipril
Group | Placebo Group | Ramipril vs
Placebo |
|
|
Secondary outcomes
| | | | |
| Revascularization |
16.0 |
18.3 |
0.85 |
0.002 |
|
Complications
related to diabetes*#
|
6.4
|
7.6 |
0.84 |
0.002 |
|
Other outcomes | | | | |
| Heart failure#
|
9.0
|
11.5 |
0.77 |
0.001 |
| Worsening angina#
|
23.8 |
26.2 |
0.89 |
0.004 |
| New diagnosis of
diabetes |
3.6 |
5.4 |
0.66 |
0.001 |
|
Complications related to diabetes include diabetic
nephropathy, dialysis, and diabetic retinopathy requiring laser
therapy.
NEJM 2000 Jan 20;342(3):145-53
The HOPE Trial included over 3500
participants with diabetes mellitus accounting for almost 40% of the total study
population. This study has thus
become one of the largest diabetes trials to date and allows for meaningful
subgroup analysis. The HOPE
diabetic patients had significant comorbidities with approximately 55-60% having
been previously diagnosed with coronary artery disease and about 55% with
hypertension. These diabetic
participants experienced a significant risk reduction of 25% in the combined
primary outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death as
well as individual risk reductions of 22% for myocardial infarction, 33% for
stroke and 37% for cardiovascular death.
A risk reduction of 16% for overt nephropathy, laser retinal therapy or
initiation of dialysis was likewise attained by the ramipril treated diabetic
participants. These results were again dramatic and consistent, and they were
comparable to those established in the main analysis.
Additional subgroup analysis
revealed a higher absolute incidence of endpoints in hypertensive patients when
compared to those without hypertension. Subjects with microalbuminuria
also had a higher absolute event rate compared with nonalbuminuric
participants. The relative risk
reduction for the primary composite outcome persisted despite these differences.
IV. Clinical Implications of the HOPE
Trial
The HOPE study showed that
ramipril therapy produced dramatic survival benefits and improved clinical
outcomes in high risk patients with and without established cardiovascular
disease. The authors of this study
have attributed the improved clinical outcomes and decreased mortality
specifically to ACE inhibitors and blockade of the renin-angiotensin system
rather than blood pressure reduction.
The magnitude of blood pressure reduction in this trial (3/2 mmHg) was
modest. According to the HOPE
investigators, this degree of blood pressure reduction appeared to have played
only a minor role and likely accounted for less than half of the risk reduction
reported. Like others, they have
postulated that the ACE inhibitor, ramipril, may have a direct protective effect
on the endothelium, vasculature and myocardium. However, this trial was not designed to
answer this mechanistic question.
These results clearly support the
use of an ACE inhibitor as essential therapy for high risk patients with
cardiovascular disease. Using
strict evidence-based medicine, JNC VI currently recommends the use of ACE
inhibitors as initial drug therapy only for hypertensive patients with diabetes
mellitus and proteinuria, heart failure, or myocardial infarction with systolic
dysfunction. The
striking results of the HOPE trial should compel physicians to include high
cardiovascular risk (defined as a history of stroke, myocardial infarction,
peripheral arterial disease, or diabetes plus an additional independent risk factor) as
a compelling indication for ACE inhibitors as initial
therapy.
TABLE IV: Indications for ACE Inhibitors as First-Line Antihypertensive Therapy
|
| INDICATION | JNC-VI | HOPE |
|
| Post-MI with LV dysfunction | X | |
| Congestive Heart Failure | X | |
| Diabetes mellitus with albuminuria | X | |
| High-risk for cardiovascular event* | | X |
|
*history of stroke, MI, peripheral arterial disease or diabetes plus at least one other CV Risk Factor
The dramatic results of this trial
also support the contention of the JNC that there is no absolute blood pressure
cut-off point above which treatment is essential and below which treatment has
no benefit. Relative risk reductions in HOPE were independent of baseline blood
pressure, and the majority of patients had blood pressure <140/90 mmHg at
study entry. JNC-VI
recommends a risk-stratification approach whereby level of blood pressure as
well as the presence or absence of other cardiovascular risk factors,
established cardiovascular disease, or end-organ damage stratifies individual
patients. Pharmacological therapy
is recommended for high-risk patients (risk group C according to JNC-VI
nomenclature) even if the blood pressure is significantly below the traditional
cut-off of 140/90 mmHg. This
discussion is particularly relevant given recent analysis of Framingham Data
that illustrates that 33% of patients with 'high normal' blood pressure
(130-140/85-90 mmHg) fall into JNC-VI risk group C (highest risk group).
Concern remains about the possible
adverse effects of ACE inhibitor therapy.
In the HOPE trial, the most commonly encountered adverse effect was
cough, which occurred in about 7% of ramipril treated participants. More serious adverse reactions such as
angioedema were quite rare and occurred in only 0.4% of ramipril treated
subjects. Adverse reactions do
occur but in a small minority of patients and should not dissuade the clinician
from using ACE inhibitors in these high-risk vascular disease patients who stand
to gain a substantial benefit.
There may also be additional
benefits from ACE inhibitor therapy as compared to other agents. Patients treated with ramipril in the
HOPE Trial had a significantly lower incidence of new diagnosis of diabetes when
compared to those who received placebo.
This stands in sharp contrast to data with other anti-hypertensive
agents, especially diuretics and beta-blockers. For example, a recent retrospective
analysis of beta-blocker therapy (ARIC) revealed a 28% increase in the incidence
of new diabetes as compared to other agents.
In the past, questions have been raised about a possible negative
interaction between aspirin and ACE inhibitors. This concern likely stemmed from some
observations from the SOLVD study where there was a trend for less benefit of
the ACE inhibitor in a subgroup of patients on aspirin. In the HOPE study more than 70% of
patients were on aspirin and no negative interaction between the two drugs was
perceived. The addition of ACE
inhibitors to aspirin therapy in this patient population may actually produce an
additive beneficial effect as has been observed in the post-myocardial
infarction studies.
The HOPE study has convincingly
demonstrated that ACE inhibitor therapy can be used safely in combination with
standard medical therapy for high risk cardiovascular disease patients with or
without coexistent hypertension.
ACE inhibitors should not replace other therapies, but should be used in
combination with them in order to achieve the highest possible survival benefit
for patients at risk. High-risk
vascular disease patients stand to benefit considerably from the concerted
efforts of physicians to employ the knowledge gained from the HOPE
trial.
Selected
References:
1.
Yusuf S,
Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G. Effects of an
angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in
high-risk patients. The Heart
Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 20;342(3):145-53.
2.
The HOPE Study
Investigators. Effects of ramipril
on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes
mellitus: results of the HOPE study
and MICRO-HOPE substudy.
Lancet. 2000 Jan
22;355(9200):253-9.
3.
National
Institutes of Health. The Sixth
Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and
Treatment of High Blood Pressure.
Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute;November
1997. NIH Publication No.
98-4080.
|